Treldo
Ad slot (header)
entertainment

Charles Spencer Criticizes Film 'Spencer' While Praising Kristen Stewart's Performance

According to Variety·10/13/2026

Summary

  • Charles Spencer recently shared his harsh critique of the biographical drama movie Spencer during a recent appearance.
  • According to Variety, Spencer spoke at a McNally Jackson Books event to discuss both the film and his own memoir.
  • While he called the movie itself terrible, he offered high praise for Kristen Stewart's portrayal of his late sister Princess Diana.
  • The discussion also involved notable figures like Tina Brown and director Pablo Larrain's creative vision for the project.

According to Variety, Charles Spencer recently offered a bluntly mixed review of the biographical drama film Spencer, describing the movie itself as terrible while singling out its leading actress for significant praise. Speaking during an appearance at a McNally Jackson Books event where he was discussing the film alongside his own memoir, Spencer addressed the cinematic depiction of his late sister, Princess Diana. While the brother of the late royal found little to appreciate in the overall execution of the motion picture directed by Pablo Larrain, he made a clear exception for Hollywood star Kristen Stewart, commending her dedicated and compelling portrayal of Princess Diana on the big screen. The cinematic project had generated substantial media attention upon its initial release, courting both critical acclaim and intense public scrutiny regarding its surrealist narrative approach to chronicling a pivotal holiday weekend with the British royal family. Charles Spencer's recent remarks bring renewed attention to how family members of historical icons process dramatic interpretations of deeply personal histories. Biopics involving modern royalty often navigate a delicate boundary between artistic license and factual sensitivity, frequently inviting polarizing reactions from those closest to the subjects being portrayed. In this instance, the critique highlights a fascinating dichotomy where the broader artistic framework of the production failed to resonate with the princess's brother, yet the central acting performance successfully captured an emotional truth that earned his endorsement. The conversation at the McNally Jackson Books event also featured commentary from figures such as Tina Brown, further contextualizing the cultural legacy and ongoing public fascination surrounding Princess Diana's enduring impact. As literary and cinematic reflections on the royal family continue to emerge, the perspectives of surviving relatives remain a powerful touchstone for audiences attempting to separate sensationalized fiction from authentic remembrance. Charles Spencer's candid assessment underscores the complex emotions that surround cinematic tributes to beloved family members, proving that even critically lauded performances can exist within productions that ultimately alienate those with the closest personal ties to the subject matter. The discussion ultimately contributed to an ongoing dialogue about how modern cinema handles biographical subjects, balancing the demands of artistic expression with the sensitivities of living relatives who lived through the real-life events being dramatized on screen. By acknowledging Kristen Stewart's talent while dismissing the film as a whole, Spencer provided a nuanced perspective that distinguishes between an actor's craft and the broader storytelling choices made by filmmakers. This distinction is likely to influence how fans and critics alike view the legacy of the picture years after its theatrical debut, keeping the conversation alive as new generations discover the film and its performances through home viewing and streaming platforms.